Author: Peter Dizikes | MIT News Office<\/p>\n
Since announcing<\/a> the MIT Stephen A. Schwarzman College of Computing, Institute leaders have reached out to the campus and alumni communities in a series of forums, seeking ideas about the transformative new entity that will radically integrate computing with disciplines throughout MIT.<\/p>\n MIT Provost Martin A. Schmidt and Dean of the School of Engineering Anantha P. Chandrakasan engaged with students, faculty, and staff at forums on campus, where they presented outlines of the project and received dozens of public comments and questions. Additionally, Chandrakasan and Executive Vice President and Treasurer Israel Ruiz engaged with alumni in two webcast sessions that featured Q&A about the college.<\/p>\n \u201cCreating this new college requires us to think deeply and carefully about its structure,\u201d Schmidt said at a forum for faculty on Oct. 18. That process should be firmly connected to the ideas and experiences of the MIT community as a whole, he said further at a student forum on Oct. 25, adding that the goal was to \u201cengage you in the process of building the college together.\u201d<\/p>\n Community perspectives<\/strong><\/p>\n The discussions at the forums each had a slightly different flavor, generally reflecting the perspectives of the participants. The faculty forum, for instance, included professors from several fields concerned about maintaining a solid balance of disciplinary research at MIT.<\/p>\n The responsibilities of professors at the new college have yet to be fully defined. Many faculty will have joint appointments between the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing and existing MIT departments, an approach that both Schmidt and Chandrakasan acknowledged has had varying results in the past. As participants noted, some MIT faculty with joint appointments have thrived, but others have floundered, being pulled in different scholarly and administrative directions.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cWe need to figure out how to make dual appointments work,\u201d Chandrakasan said. Still, he noted that the \u201ccross-cutting\u201d structure of the college had enormous potential to integrate computing into the full range of disciplines at the Institute.<\/p>\n At a standing-room-only forum for MIT staff members on Oct. 25, with people lining the walls of Room 4-270, audience members offered comments and questions about the college\u2019s proposed main building, MIT\u2019s computing infrastructure, teaching, advising, the admissions process, and the need to hire motivated staff in the college\u2019s most formative stages.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s an opportunity to really do a whole-of-Institute solution to this challenge,\u201d Schmidt said. \u201cIt\u2019s going to test us.\u201d<\/p>\n Multiple people at the student forum on Oct. 25 called for diversity among the college\u2019s new faculty \u2014 a view Schmidt and Chandrakasan readily agreed with. The Institute leaders also emphasized the expansion of opportunities the college will provide for students, including more joint programs and degrees, and more student support.<\/p>\n \u201cThere will be more UROP opportunities, more resources, more faculty,\u201d Chandrakasan said. Also, he noted, \u201cWe\u2019re not going to change the undergraduate admissions process.\u201d MIT Chancellor Cynthia Barnhart also spoke at the student forum.<\/p>\n At all three on-campus forums, audience participants commented upon the value of having Institute supporters share MIT\u2019s goal of creating a \u201cbetter world.\u201d At the staff forum, one audience member advocated that MIT only accept funding from backers who were fully committed to democracy, and questioned the Institute\u2019s connections with Saudi Arabia. Schmidt noted that MIT \u2014 as it has publicly announced \u2014 is currently reassessing MIT\u2019s Institute-level engagements with entities of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.<\/p>\n At the student forum, audience members also raised queries about MIT\u2019s mission and its relationships with donors; the issues cited included the precedent of naming the college after an individual, and the extent of MIT\u2019s due diligence process during the creation of the college. Schmidt said the Institute had performed its due diligence well and developed the idea of the named college after extensive discussions; he also noted that faculty and students of the college would be able to develop a full range of intellectual and academic projects freely.<\/p>\n Audience members also stressed the generalized need to think critically about the impact of technology on society at a moment of social, political, and ecological uncertainty \u2014 and expressed a preference for the college to integrate ethics into its curriculum.<\/p>\n \u201cThis presents a real opportunity to get at that,\u201d Chandrakasan responded.<\/p>\n On Oct. 30, the Alumni Association hosted two webcasts that featured Q&A with Chandrakasan and Ruiz. Over 1,000 alumni from around the world registered for the virtual conversations, which were moderated by Vice President for Communications Nate Nickerson. Questions centered on how the cross-disciplinary aspirations of the college would find life, and on how ethics will be made to infuse the college and shape its graduates. In both sessions, alumni asked how they can participate in the pursuit of the college\u2019s mission. \u201cThe alumni will be critical to our efforts,\u201d said Ruiz. \u201cThey offer us great wisdom as we form the college, and they will serve as important points of connection for our faculty and students as they seek to understand all the ways that computing is shaping our world.\u201d<\/p>\n Helping every department<\/strong><\/p>\n The college is being developed thanks to a $350 million foundational gift from Mr. Schwarzman, the chairman, CEO, and co-founder of Blackstone, a leading global asset manager. It will serve as an interdisciplinary hub for research and teaching across all aspects of computing, while strengthening links between computing and other scholarly pursuits.<\/p>\n \u201cThe college has two goals,\u201d said Chandrakasan at the forum for MIT staff members. \u201cOne is to advance computing, and one is to link computing to other other [fields]. \u2026 This allows us to optimize, unbundle, and rebundle, to make computing much more integrated across all disciplines.\u201d<\/p>\n It also presents new organizational challenges. For decades, MIT has been largely organized around its five schools, which focus on engineering; science; architecture and planning; humanities, arts, and social sciences; and management. But as Chandrakasan emphasized in all three campus forums, the MIT Schwarzman College of Computing is intended to develop connections with all of those schools as well as other stand-alone institutes and programs on campus.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is about helping advance every department,\u201d said Chandrakasan, who frequently referred to the importance of the college\u2019s \u201cbridge\u201d function, meaning it can span the width of MIT to link students, faculty, and resources together.<\/p>\n For his part, Schmidt emphasized at the events that the college will accelerate the current trend in disciplinary transformation. He noted that the fields of economics and urban studies at MIT have both recently created joint degrees with computer science as a natural response to the ways data and computing power have enabled new modes of academic research.<\/p>\n The foundational gift is part of a $1 billion commitment MIT has made to the new college, which will be centered in a new campus building, include 50 new faculty and allow the Institute to create a new series of collaborative, interdisciplinary enterprises in research and education. The college is meant to address all aspects of computing, including the policy and ethical issues surrounding new technologies.<\/p>\n \u201cAcross the Institute there is great enthusiasm for this,\u201d Chandrakasan added.<\/p>\n \u201cA unique opportunity to evolve\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n The MIT Schwarzman College of Computing is intended to open in the fall of 2019 and will be housed partly \u2014 but not entirely \u2014 in its new building. The timeline, Chandrakasan acknowledged, is \u201csuper-aggressive.\u201d<\/p>\n Schmidt and Chandrakasan noted that many important issues were yet to be resolved. As part of the process of developing the college, the Institute is creating a task force and working groups to assess some of the critical issues MIT faces.<\/p>\n Some audience members at the forums also questioned why MIT would announce the creation of its new college at a time when some of the entity\u2019s institutional features are unresolved. In response, Schmidt noted that the Institute benefits by being on the leading edge of computing, and that the creation of the college will only enhance that position. Community engagement, he noted, would help the Institute finalize its vision for the college.<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019re not going to be able to answer all of [your] questions,\u201d Schmidt said at the staff forum. To gain traction on unresolved matters, he added, \u201cWe think the task force model is an appropriate one.\u201d<\/p>\n MIT intends to hire a dean for the college and begin the search process for new faculty during the current academic year. There are a few campus sites being considered as the location for the college\u2019s main building, but not all elements of the college will be located in that building.<\/p>\n Overall, Schmidt concluded, the creation of the college has presented MIT with a unique opportunity to evolve in response to the prevalence of computing and its influence in so many spheres of life.<\/p>\n \u201cEvery campus in the country today has been grappling with the need,\u201d Schmidt said. \u201cWe feel that MIT has come forward with a really compelling solution.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Go to Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"